Representation before tax and other tribunals is a key aspect of professional practice. A frequently debated question among tax professionals and litigants is:
Can a Chartered Accountant (CA) represent a client before a Tribunal?
The answer depends on the statute governing the particular Tribunal. In light of a recent litigation in the courts, this issue has acquired fresh significance.
Representation Rights Under the Income-tax Act, 1961
Section 288 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 grants an assessee the right to be represented by an “Authorized Representative” in proceedings under the Act.
The scope of “Authorized Representative” includes:
- Chartered Accountants
- Advocates
- Employees of the assessee
- Other persons prescribed under the law
Accordingly, a Chartered Accountant may represent an assessee before:
- Assessing Officer (AO)
- Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals)
- Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
Therefore, in matters before the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT), a CA is expressly entitled to appear under Section 288 of the Income-tax Act.
Why the Debate Arises
Section 288 applies strictly to proceedings under the Income-tax Act. It does not automatically extend to other Tribunals created under different statutes, such as:
- National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT)
- GST Appellate Tribunals
- Other regulatory tribunals
Many of these statutes contain their own representation provisions. In some cases, a statute may appear to permit professionals like CAs, Company Secretaries (CS), or Cost Accountants (CMA) to represent parties. In others, the Advocates Act, 1961 may be interpreted to restrict representation before Tribunals to enrolled advocates only.
Recent Case: Delhi High Court Challenge on Representation Rights
A significant development has emerged in the courts on this very question.
A batch of connected writ petitions is currently pending before the Delhi High Court, brought by the Bar Council of India and the Association of Tax Lawyers, among others. These petitions challenge the extent to which persons who are not enrolled as advocates, such as Chartered Accountants, Company Secretaries, and Cost Accountants, can appear and argue cases before Tribunals.
The core issue before the Court is whether the exclusive right to practice law under the Advocates Act, 1961 precludes non-advocates from representing clients in Tribunal proceedings, despite provisions in sectoral laws (for example, the Companies Act or Income-tax Act) that have traditionally allowed such appearances.
At the last hearing on 16 February 2026, a Division Bench of the Delhi High Court comprising Justices Prathiba M. Singh and Madhu Jain adjourned the matter and listed it for further hearing on 16 March 2026. This case remains part-heard, and no final decision has been delivered yet.
The outcome of this litigation could have wide-ranging implications for professional practice in areas such as tax, company law, and other Tribunal forums. If the Court rules strictly in favour of the Advocates Act, the rights of CAs, CSs and CMAs to represent clients before certain Tribunals could be curtailed. Conversely, a more balanced reading may uphold the existing practice rights based on specific statutes.
Governing Principle
The right of representation before a Tribunal is governed by the statute under which that Tribunal is constituted.
- For the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal, Section 288 of the Income-tax Act permits CA representation.
- For other Tribunals, representation rights depend on:
- The specific wording of the governing statute
- Rules and regulations of the Tribunal
- Interpretation by higher courts, including in ongoing cases like the Delhi High Court challenge
Practical Implications for Tax Professionals
Before appearing in any Tribunal:
- Review the representation provisions of the governing statute.
- Check Tribunal rules for eligibility criteria.
- Monitor the progress and eventual decision of the Delhi High Court case, as it may redefine practice rights.
Assuming automatic eligibility in all forums without reference to applicable law may lead to procedural objections, rejection of representation, or adverse orders.
Conclusion
A Chartered Accountant is clearly entitled to represent an assessee before ITAT under Section 288 of the Income-tax Act. However, the scope of representation before other Tribunals is currently under judicial scrutiny in the Delhi High Court. The high court will decide whether non-advocates such as CAs can appear before Tribunals in light of the Advocates Act, 1961 and other sectoral laws. The next hearing in this important case is scheduled for 16 March 2026, and its outcome could significantly affect representation rights across various legal fora.
Stox N Tax 
Leave a comment