The Union Budget 2025 has introduced pivotal changes to India’s taxation landscape, particularly addressing the issue of ‘evergreening’ of carry-forward losses in mergers and business reorganizations. This detailed article explains the changes, their implications, and provides real-life examples for clearer understanding.
Understanding Evergreening of Carry-Forward Losses
‘Evergreening’ refers to the practice wherein companies merge primarily to benefit from accumulated losses of the merging entities, offsetting these losses against future profits. Previously, this practice allowed companies to continuously carry forward these losses, substantially reducing their taxable income.
Key Provisions in Budget 2025
The Budget 2025 seeks to curb misuse through stricter provisions. Losses of merged entities will now face rigorous scrutiny and can only be carried forward if the transaction:
- Has genuine commercial rationale.
- Demonstrates continuity in the original business.
- Is not primarily structured for tax avoidance purposes.
Criteria for Scrutiny
Authorities will specifically assess:
- Commercial Substance: The transaction must demonstrate clear business intent beyond just tax saving.
- Continuity of Business: Ensuring the business operations substantially remain unchanged after the merger or reorganization.
- Valid documentation supporting the strategic goals behind the restructuring.
Illustrative Examples
Example 1: Acceptable Carry-Forward of Losses
Situation: Company A (profitable) merges with Company B (loss-making) due to genuine operational synergy. Post-merger, the combined entity continues business operations of both companies seamlessly.
Outcome: Since the restructuring has a clear commercial rationale, continuity of business operations, and substantial business purposes beyond tax benefits, the carry-forward of losses from Company B would likely be permissible.
Example 2: Unacceptable Evergreening
Situation: Company X, having considerable profits, merges with Company Y, a shell company holding substantial historical losses but with minimal business activities. Post-merger, the operations of Company Y are discontinued, and only the losses are used for tax benefits.
Implication: Authorities will reject the carry-forward losses, citing lack of genuine business continuity and primary intent of tax avoidance.
Example 2: Conditional Approval
Situation: Company M acquires Company N, which holds significant accumulated losses but also has valuable intellectual property and operational assets. Post-acquisition, Company M integrates and continues Company Y’s operations but restructures significantly, focusing primarily on using losses to reduce taxes.
Analysis: Authorities may partially allow carry-forward losses after a thorough examination to ensure substantive business continuity and verify that tax avoidance is not the main motive.
Strategic Considerations for Businesses
Companies involved in restructuring must:
- Maintain detailed documentation of the merger’s commercial rationale.
- Ensure operational continuity post-restructuring.
- Consult regularly with tax experts to validate compliance.
Regulatory Compliance & Scrutiny
The Income Tax Department is expected to closely monitor mergers post-implementation of this regulation. Companies should expect increased audits and scrutiny, demanding thorough preparedness and transparency in their restructuring plans.
Conclusion
The new provisions of Budget 2025 aim to tighten regulatory oversight and promote transparency in corporate restructuring. Businesses must adapt and ensure that their restructuring plans align with the enhanced compliance expectations to avoid potential tax disputes.
Consulting experienced tax professionals will be essential to navigate these new complexities effectively.
Stox N Tax 
Leave a comment