The appointment of a chairman in shareholders meetings is a critical corporate governance mechanism that determines who controls the proceedings and decision-making process. Understanding the legal framework under Section 104 of the Companies Act, 2013, and the corresponding Secretarial Standard-2 (SS-2) on General Meetings , issued by ICSI is essential for corporate professionals, company secretaries, and law students preparing for corporate law examinations.
1. Procedure for Appointment of Chairman
Section 104 read with SS-2 establishes a clear hierarchical framework for chairman appointment in general meetings, ensuring orderly conduct and preventing procedural deadlocks.
Primary Rule – Chairman of the Board: The Chairman of the Board shall automatically take the chair and conduct the meeting. This establishes the board chairman’s inherent right to preside over shareholder meetings.
First Fallback – Director Election: If the Chairman of the Board is not present within fifteen minutes after the appointed time, or is unwilling to act, or if no director has been designated as chairman, the directors present shall elect one of themselves to chair the meeting.
Final Fallback – Member Election: If no director is present within fifteen minutes after the appointed time, or if no director is willing to take the chair, the members present shall elect one of themselves as chairman through a show of hands vote, unless the Articles of Association provide otherwise.
1. 1. Exception
In case of a private company, appointment of the Chairman shall be in accordance with the procedure mentioned above, unless otherwise provided in the Articles.
2. Implementation Guidelines for Meeting Conduct
SS-2 provides detailed procedural guidance that complements Section 104, offering clarity on implementation aspects and ensuring uniformity in meeting conduct across companies.
Meeting Commencement: SS-2 emphasizes the importance of starting meetings on time and following the hierarchical chairman appointment process.
Voting Procedures for Chairman Election: When members need to elect a chairman under the third tier, the process follows show of hands voting as mandated by SS-2.
Chairman’s Powers and Responsibilities: Once appointed through any of the above mentioned three methods, the chairman has broad powers to maintain order, regulate debate, ensure proper conduct of business, and protect all shareholders’ interests. They can adjourn meetings if necessary and exercise the casting vote in case of ties on resolutions.
Resolution Explanation Duty: SS-2 mandates that the Chairman shall explain the objective and implications of the Resolutions before they are put to vote at the Meeting. This ensures informed decision-making by shareholders and enhances transparency in the voting process.
Conflict of Interest Management: In case of public companies, SS-2 provides that the Chairman shall not propose any Resolution in which he is deemed to be concerned or interested nor shall he conduct the proceedings for that item of business. He shall entrust the conduct of the proceedings in respect of such item to any Non-Interested Director or to a Member, with the consent of the Members present, and resume the Chair after that specific item is concluded.
Documentation Requirements: SS-2 mandates proper documentation of the chairman appointment process, especially when the normal hierarchy as explained before is disrupted and alternative appointment methods are used. This includes recording any instances where the chairman stepped down for specific agenda items due to conflicts of interest.
3. Professional Best Practices for Chairman Appointment in Corporate Governance
For Company Secretaries: Understand the three-tier hierarchy and be prepared to facilitate director elections or member elections when necessary. Maintain clear documentation of which tier was used for chairman appointment and ensure proper voting procedures are followed. Prepare resolution explanatory notes for the chairman to present before voting and identify potential conflict of interest situations in advance.
Review Articles of Association to identify any special provisions for member election of chairman. Ensure clients understand the automatic right of the Board Chairman to preside and the cascading fallback mechanisms. Advise on proper conflict of interest management procedures for public companies.
For Corporate Boards: Board Chairman should understand their automatic right to chair meetings and their obligation to explain resolutions before voting. Other directors should be prepared to step in when required and understand the election process among directors. In public companies, directors must be aware of conflict of interest protocols.
4. Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) – Chairman Appointment in Shareholders Meetings
Q1: Is there any requirement to mention chairman appointment procedures in the meeting notice?
Answer: No, Section 104 does not require companies to specify chairman appointment procedures in meeting notices. The law provides an automatic hierarchy that applies regardless of what is mentioned in the notice.
Q2: Can members directly elect a chairman even if directors are present?
Answer: No, SS-2 establishes a clear hierarchy. Members can only elect a chairman if no director is present within fifteen minutes or if no director is willing to chair the meeting.
Q3: What is the voting method when members elect a chairman?
Answer: Section 104 read with SS-2, specifically mandates that when members elect a chairman, it must be done “on a show of hands” unless the Articles of Association provide otherwise.
Q4: Can the Articles of Association override the Section 104 provisions?
Answer: The Articles can only override the final fallback provision regarding member election of chairman. The primary right of the Board Chairman and the director election process cannot be overridden by Articles.
Q5: What happens if no one is willing to act as chairman at any level?
Answer: If the entire hierarchy fails (Board Chairman unwilling, no directors willing, no members willing), the meeting cannot proceed and must be adjourned. This is an exceptional situation that companies should avoid through proper planning.
Q6: Does the fifteen-minute rule apply to all three tiers of the hierarchy?
Answer: The fifteen-minute rule specifically applies to the Board Chairman’s presence and directors’ presence. It ensures meetings don’t wait indefinitely and triggers the fallback mechanisms.
Q7: What happens if a chairman fails to explain resolutions before voting?
Answer: Failure to explain resolutions as required by SS-2 can be considered a procedural lapse that may affect the validity of the voting process. It can lead to challenges regarding informed consent of shareholders and proper meeting conduct.
Q8: Can members object to a chairman’s explanation of resolutions?
Answer: Yes, members can seek clarifications or raise objections if they feel the chairman’s explanation is inadequate, biased, or incorrect. The chairman should address such concerns to ensure proper understanding before proceeding to vote.
5. Conclusion: Mastering Chairman Appointment for Corporate Success
The appointment of a chairman in shareholders meetings represents more than a procedural formality – it embodies the principle of democratic corporate governance while ensuring business continuity and stakeholder protection. Section 104 and SS-2 together create a robust legal and professional framework that balances regulatory requirements with practical business necessities.
For corporate professionals, mastering these provisions means smoother meeting conduct, reduced legal risks, and enhanced corporate governance standards. For students pursuing careers in corporate law or company secretaryship, understanding chairman appointment procedures provides essential insights into how corporate law translates into real-world governance practices.
The key takeaway for both professionals and students: thorough preparation, understanding of legal requirements, and adherence to professional standards are essential for effective corporate governance. Whether you’re an experienced company secretary conducting your hundredth AGM or a law student studying corporate governance principles, these provisions will repeatedly impact your professional practice and career development.
Success in corporate governance requires continuous learning, practical application of legal knowledge, and commitment to maintaining the highest standards of professional conduct in all meeting procedures.
As your Company’s AGM/EGM approaches, make sure to follow the rules of the Companies Act, 2013, and SS-2.
This analysis is based on the Companies Act, 2013, and Secretarial Standard-2 as applicable in India. Always consult current legal provisions and seek professional advice for specific situations.
Stox N Tax 
Leave a comment